My posting of this picture on Facebook earlier this week
caused a bit of a fuss.
It was taken at the Primary School section of the Wildeklawer
festival by freelance photographer Frans Lombard, who posted a cutting featuring
it on his Facebook page. He was, rightly, proud of the fact that he had one of
his pictures appear on page 3 of the Rapport last Sunday.
The caption on the photo translates, roughly, as “Out of the
way, Vleis is on the charge!”
Frans Lombard is the nicest of all the long-lens men that I
used to come across regularly in the corners of school rugby fields back when I
was in that game. He is a brilliant photographer and this is a stunning image.
My misgivings about it have nothing to do with Frans.
Snaps are just that – split second captures. They freeze the
instant and the context, the past and the future, are not part of them.
Among the comments to my post were two from journalists I
know and respect. They criticised the fact that the picture doesn’t show the
context – the rest of the game, and “Vleis’” performance at the festival. He
wasn’t the dominant bully that the picture suggests. I accept that and it’s unfair
of me to assume that. But that’s the story the picture tells, and that’s the
reason why the newspaper ran it, and added that appalling, aggressive caption.
Based on my incorrect assessment of the situation, I then
went off about the unfairness of matching early-developing giants against regular
sized kids in junior rugby games. Of course I know that those big boys are eventually
dragged down by the sheer weight of the multiple tacklers who are hanging on to
him and, yes, in their high school years the others inevitably catch up to them
size-wise.
It’s not an original story. Go to the primary school Craven
Week and you’ll see one or two really big men in several of the teams. I’ve coached
such a player and he was just about the same size in matric that he was in
grade 8, and nowhere nearly as effective.
I got a lot of support for my view that such uneven matchups
aren’t educational and shouldn’t be allowed. I can’t offer a solution, though.
I remember speaking to Clint Readhead, SA Rugby's medical manager, about it at the u-13 Craven Week at
Glenwood a few years ago where there were two Vleis-sized specimens in action
for two different teams.
That’s when he told me that SA Rugby had studied the New
Zealand model of playing junior rugby according weight divisions, and decided
not to go that way. From a safety viewpoint, their research shows that there
aren’t many serious injuries arising from collisions between big and small
players. Serious injuries occur in the scrums and scrums are, therefore,
strictly regulated; and they occur in high-speed, dynamic situations, and those
don’t usually involve the giants.
The other side of the coin – the older players who are as
small as the babies – is more concerning, Readhead said. Clearly, a 16 year-old,
with three or four years of playing experience, who is almost fully grown at a
weight that would be the average in a team of 12 year-old beginners, has a big
advantage, and if he is poorly coached and allowed to be mean-spirited, that
can be dangerous.
That’s the explanation for why we don’t play according to
weight. It sounds right, but it means we have these mismatches.
My real concern is the optics of that photo. It captures a disturbing
situation. The caption doesn’t help, neither do some of the comments on Frans
Lombard’s original post. One that sticks out translated into “you can see that
tackler’s soul being knocked out of him”!
That’s someone’s child. And yes, I don’t know whether he
looked back on that situation as a fun experience, and maybe it will make him a
better player in the long run.
All I can go on is what was captured in the moment, and it
doesn’t paint a picture that is good for the game, particularly not for the group who those who are battling to keep the game alive know are the most important people in
that struggle – the mothers who have to allow their little sons to take up the
game.
Comments
Post a Comment